| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
04/08/2016 |
|
Actualizado : |
10/09/2018 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Documentos |
|
Autor : |
JAURENA, M.; OLMOS, F.; BEMHAJA, M.; BERRETTA, E.J.; LEZAMA, F.; PEREZ GOMAR, E.; ZERBINO, M.; CONDON, F.; BLUMETTO, O.; CASTAÑO, J.; ROCANOVA, M. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARTIN ALEJANDRO JAURENA BARRIOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FERNANDO ELCEAR OLMOS LOPEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA DE LURDES BEMHAJA SARAIVA FERREIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ELBIO JOAQUIN BERRETTA CARVALLO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FELIPE LEZAMA HUERTA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ENRIQUE PEREZ GOMAR CAPURRO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA STELLA ZERBINO BARDIER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FEDERICO CONDON PRIANO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; OSCAR RICARDO BLUMETTO VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSE PEDRO CASTAÑO SANCHEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MAGDALENA ROCANOVA RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Campo natural en Uruguay: biodiversidad y manejo para la sustentabilidad. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2008 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Suplemento Tecnológico INIA, 2008, p. 42-43. |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Notas : |
Suplemento tecnológico Expo Prado 2008. |
|
Thesagro : |
BIODIVERSIDAD; CAMPO NATURAL; RECURSOS NATURALES; SUSTENTABILIDAD; URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00825nam a2200289 a 4500
001 1055175
005 2018-09-10
008 2008 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aJAURENA, M.
245 $aCampo natural en Uruguay$bbiodiversidad y manejo para la sustentabilidad.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aSuplemento Tecnológico INIA, 2008, p. 42-43.$c2008
500 $aSuplemento tecnológico Expo Prado 2008.
650 $aBIODIVERSIDAD
650 $aCAMPO NATURAL
650 $aRECURSOS NATURALES
650 $aSUSTENTABILIDAD
650 $aURUGUAY
700 1 $aOLMOS, F.
700 1 $aBEMHAJA, M.
700 1 $aBERRETTA, E.J.
700 1 $aLEZAMA, F.
700 1 $aPEREZ GOMAR, E.
700 1 $aZERBINO, M.
700 1 $aCONDON, F.
700 1 $aBLUMETTO, O.
700 1 $aCASTAÑO, J.
700 1 $aROCANOVA, M.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
22/04/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
09/06/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
MIRABALLES, C.; BARROS, A.T.M.; LUCAS, M.; KLAFKE, G.M.; DOMINGUES, L.N.; RIET-CORREA, F. |
|
Afiliación : |
MÓNICA CECILIA MIRABALLES FERRER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANTONIO THADEU M. BARROS, Embrapa Beef Cattle, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.; MARTÍN LUCAS FONSECA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay.; GUILHERME M. KLAFKE, Centro de Pesquisa em Saúde Animal, Instituto de Pesquisas Veterinárias Desidério Finamor, Brazil.; LUÍSA N. DOMINGUES, USDA-ARS Knipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory, 2700 Fredericksburg Road, Kerrville, TX, USA 78028.; FRANKLIN RIET-CORREA AMARAL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Susceptibility of field populations of Haematobia irritans to fipronil in Uruguay. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Pesquisa Veterinaria Brasileira, 2021, Volume 41, Article number e06821. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-5150-PVB-6821 |
|
DOI : |
10.1590/1678-5150-PVB-6821 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: 1 Received on December 4, 2020. Accepted for publication on December 16, 2020. Acknowledgments.- We would like to acknowledge Gonzalo Escayola, the
ranchers, the staff of the slaughterhouse and the interns who collaborated on this study. This work was supported by the ?Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria? (INIA), Uruguay, project number CL 35. |
|
Contenido : |
Fipronil was registered in Uruguay in 1997, and, since then, it has been used for the control of Haematobia irritans irritans and Rhipicephalus microplus. The susceptibility of H. irritants to this drug has not been evaluated. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to evaluate the resistance of H. irritans to fipronil. Additionally, a survey was carried out with the farmers to evaluate the use of fipronil for H. irritans control in the ranches where the flies came from. For the bioassays, 31 field populations of H. irritans were exposed to 10 concentrations of fipronil (3.2-16.0?g.cm2 ), and their LC50 values were calculated using probit analysis. A bioassay was performed with horn flies from the susceptible colony maintained at the USDA-ARS Knipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory for comparison and calculation of resistance ratios (RRs). All 31 field populations surveyed in the study were susceptible to fipronil, with resistance ratios ranging from <0.5 to 2.2. Four populations with RRs >1 did not differ significantly from the susceptible strain. A single population showed an RR >2.2. Overall, the survey shows that fipronil was mostly used for R. microplus control, and in only three ranches, which were free of R. microplus, was fipronil used for horn fly control. Seventeen farmers did not use fipronil at all in the last three years. It is concluded that, in Uruguay, field populations of horn flies remain susceptible to fipronil. |
|
Palabras claves : |
BIOASSAYS; FIPRONIL; HEMATOBIA IRRITANS; INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT. |
|
Thesagro : |
URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15509/1/Miraballes-et-al-2021.pdf
https://www.scielo.br/j/pvb/a/s7F8dxtqmS8DRGQvK6ZFSpx/?lang=en&format=pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02688naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1061990
005 2021-06-09
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1590/1678-5150-PVB-6821$2DOI
100 1 $aMIRABALLES, C.
245 $aSusceptibility of field populations of Haematobia irritans to fipronil in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: 1 Received on December 4, 2020. Accepted for publication on December 16, 2020. Acknowledgments.- We would like to acknowledge Gonzalo Escayola, the ranchers, the staff of the slaughterhouse and the interns who collaborated on this study. This work was supported by the ?Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria? (INIA), Uruguay, project number CL 35.
520 $aFipronil was registered in Uruguay in 1997, and, since then, it has been used for the control of Haematobia irritans irritans and Rhipicephalus microplus. The susceptibility of H. irritants to this drug has not been evaluated. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to evaluate the resistance of H. irritans to fipronil. Additionally, a survey was carried out with the farmers to evaluate the use of fipronil for H. irritans control in the ranches where the flies came from. For the bioassays, 31 field populations of H. irritans were exposed to 10 concentrations of fipronil (3.2-16.0?g.cm2 ), and their LC50 values were calculated using probit analysis. A bioassay was performed with horn flies from the susceptible colony maintained at the USDA-ARS Knipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory for comparison and calculation of resistance ratios (RRs). All 31 field populations surveyed in the study were susceptible to fipronil, with resistance ratios ranging from <0.5 to 2.2. Four populations with RRs >1 did not differ significantly from the susceptible strain. A single population showed an RR >2.2. Overall, the survey shows that fipronil was mostly used for R. microplus control, and in only three ranches, which were free of R. microplus, was fipronil used for horn fly control. Seventeen farmers did not use fipronil at all in the last three years. It is concluded that, in Uruguay, field populations of horn flies remain susceptible to fipronil.
650 $aURUGUAY
653 $aBIOASSAYS
653 $aFIPRONIL
653 $aHEMATOBIA IRRITANS
653 $aINTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT
700 1 $aBARROS, A.T.M.
700 1 $aLUCAS, M.
700 1 $aKLAFKE, G.M.
700 1 $aDOMINGUES, L.N.
700 1 $aRIET-CORREA, F.
773 $tPesquisa Veterinaria Brasileira, 2021, Volume 41, Article number e06821. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-5150-PVB-6821
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
